lisasmall ([info]lisasmall) wrote,
@ 2008-10-30 00:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:2008 election, obama

Jane The Hairdresser

I was fumbling around the internet and found someone saying the same thing I said, but about an actual conversation with his hairdresser instead of the abstract hand-wringing I was doing. He also attributes the self-sabotage to a fear of socialism rather than, as I do, to being wealth groupies. Here's Peter Ross Range writing in Der Spiegel, emphasis added:


    So I'm sitting in the hair salon, getting a haircut, and my Korean immigrant hairdresser begins telling me all the reasons she plans to vote for John McCain.

    First, she says, Barack Obama wants to "give away money to the poor people." That, she declares, “is socialism.” Admitting that she earns about $30,000-40,000 a year before tax, she begins defending the lawyers who earn $250,000 or more and would have to pay a higher tax rate under Obama’s tax plan. "These are my customers. They have lots of bills, two or three kids in college, big houses, two cars. Things are hard for them, too."

    It was breathtaking.

    Here an up-by-her-bootstraps first-generation immigrant, who lives in a small city apartment that she shares with her sister, is coming to the rescue of highly-paid Washington lawyers with big houses in the suburbs. "They shouldn’t have to pay more taxes than other people," she continues, snip-snip. "They work hard, just like I do." Snip, snip.

    Her sister, who also earns around $30,000 per year, pipes up. "I know his tax idea is probably good for us. We don’t earn so much. But it’s wrong that he wants to tax other people so much. I will vote for McCain."

    It was a bracing moment, and a quick reminder of the power of misinformation. We’re only two blocks from the White House. My interlocutors (the two sisters) are self-proclaimed "news junkies." And yet they’ve bought into one of the biggest canards of the McCain propaganda machine: that Barack Obama is a socialist.

    In the American political lexicon, socialist is a dirty word second only to communist. Both words translate into "un-American," which is maybe the worst epithet of all.

    The fact is that only 5 percent of US households have incomes greater than $250,000. And the analyses I’ve read suggest Obama’s plan to raise taxes on those households, though supposedly a 3-percent increase from 36 percent to 39 percent, would in fact translate into relatively modest tax hikes. Silly me, I thought everyone understood that.

    Not my hairdressers. And to the extent that one of them grasped that she would be better off under Obama’s plan, her devotion to the anti-socialist principle leads her to vote knowingly against her own self-interest.



(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]jehannamama
2008-10-30 09:20 am UTC (link)
What is shocking is that Ronnie actually was talking about the same thing not too long ago. I had to send graphs of the different plans. (I think they are somewhere on my blog a few days ago). Scary how convincing they are!

(Reply to this)

Spreading the wealth
(Anonymous)
2008-11-02 06:21 pm UTC (link)
Hi,

I'm a cog in the Fox News Karl Rove Republican Echo Machine. I thought I'd pipe up on socialism. Spreading wealth is socialism, plain and simple. It seems to me that you don't think a wealthy lawyer deserved what he earned. That's about an un-American as it gets. I'd have to agree with the wisdom of the hairdressers. Far from being duped by the news, these hairdressers seem to have made the right choice despite the news.

--Eric

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Spreading the wealth
[info]lisasmall
2008-11-03 08:20 pm UTC (link)
Eric, even if you hadn't said so, it would be obvious you're basing your worldview on what you've gleaned from the disinformation machine. For your own sake, you need to get out of the echo chamber and learn how to verify what you've been told. Right now, your position sounds as if Joe McCarthy read 1984 while skipping Econ 101 before telling you what to type.

1. The Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified on February 25, 1913 in response to calls for a graduated income tax. You can't get much more American than the Constitution itself.

2. The largest socialist program the U.S. has ever implemented was put in place this past month, at the desperate urging of a Republican president, to attempt to make a start at cleaning up a Republican mess: the collapse of Republican-deregulated financial institutions, leading to the near-collapse of worldwide credit markets. Republicans caused the problem, Republicans wrote the bill to attempt to address the problem, Republicans are administering the $700 billion taken from hairdressers and Joe the Plumber to finance the Wall Street bailout. To put it in little words: a portion of the wages of the middle- and lower-income classes have been socialized to provide rescue and rewards to the richest segment of the populace — our bankers and financiers.

3. The hairdressers are neither wise nor correct. They are wealth groupies, letting their ambitions for the future blind them to their present reality. Realistic ambition is a good thing. Blind, self-sabotaging ambition is foolish.

4. "It seems to me that you don't think a wealthy lawyer deserved what he earned." Check my profile before trying to make definitive statements about what you imagine I think. I am a lawyer, specifically, a Constitutional lawyer admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court (which can be confirmed by a phone call, if you think someone who is not anonymous would dare make such a claim falsely.)

Now, I don't have the five million dollars McCain claims a person needs for him to call them wealthy, but most sane people wouldn't sit up nights composing posts claiming that I, as a lawyer, feel that lawyers don't deserve the fruits of their labors. All laborers are worthy of their hire — every worker should get paid — and every worker should pay back into the common pot a reasonable percentage to finance the society that makes their work and wages possible. No matter what Rush and Rove have told you, capitalism relies on taxes to provide the infrastructure which makes private profit possible. And that's what Obama is promoting.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…